Subject	Bah. I dont think 2+2's are any slower than 2+0. Ask Arnel. (n/m)
Posted by	Jackie Chan on June 23, 2001 at 9:38 PM
	This message has been viewed 11 times.
In Reply To	Re: Was 93" a 2+2 also? More weight compared to 2 seater. posted by CaptanZap on June 23, 2001 at 09:35 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Just not the same... - CaptanZap 21:01:27 06/23/01 Was 93" a 2+2 also? More weight compared to 2 seater. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 21:06:36 06/23/01 Re: Was 93" a 2+2 also? More weight compared to 2 seater. - CaptanZap 21:35:06 06/23/01 Bah. I dont think 2+2's are any slower than 2+0. Ask Arnel. (n/m) - Jackie Chan 21:38:52 06/23/01 Weight diff is not huge. They'll run pretty close. (n/m) - Arnel(njoynmyz.com) 06:56:55 06/24/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.